TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

California International Bank, N.A. vs Lbs Financial Credit Union

Bank

California International Bank, N.A.

Westminster, California · $100 million – $1 billion

89of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Lbs Financial Credit Union

Long Beach, California · $1 billion – $10 billion

79of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureCalifornia International Bank, N.A.Lbs Financial Credit Union
TellerScore89 (stronger)79
Capital cushion85 (stronger)81
Loan quality100 (stronger)80
Earnings89 (stronger)50
Funding & liquidity7099 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage100 (stronger)95
Peer percentile94th86th
Total assets$120.9M$2.2B
Deposits / shares$105.9M$1.9B
Capital ratio13.51% (stronger)13.11%
Problem loans0.00% (stronger)0.61%
Net charge-offs0.00% (stronger)0.79%
Return on assets1.71% (stronger)0.74%
Loans ÷ deposits76.7%61.5% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits27.3%14.2% (stronger)
Offices16
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

California International Bank, N.A. has the higher TellerScore (89 vs 79). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), California International Bank, N.A. leads on 5 and Lbs Financial Credit Union on 2. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions