TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

California International Bank, N.A. vs Mid-Cities Credit Union

Bank

California International Bank, N.A.

Westminster, California · $100 million – $1 billion

89of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Mid-Cities Credit Union

Compton, California · Under $100 million in assets

54of 100
Below average

Metric by metric

MeasureCalifornia International Bank, N.A.Mid-Cities Credit Union
TellerScore89 (stronger)54
Capital cushion85 (stronger)21
Loan quality100 (stronger)77
Earnings89 (stronger)21
Funding & liquidity70100 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage100 (stronger)92
Peer percentile94th13th
Total assets$120.9M$16.0M
Deposits / shares$105.9M$14.6M
Capital ratio13.51% (stronger)7.11%
Problem loans0.00% (stronger)0.69%
Net charge-offs0.00% (stronger)1.73%
Return on assets1.71% (stronger)0.01%
Loans ÷ deposits76.7%35.7% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits27.3%0.0% (stronger)
Offices11
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

California International Bank, N.A. has the higher TellerScore (89 vs 54). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), California International Bank, N.A. leads on 5 and Mid-Cities Credit Union on 2. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions