TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Cascade Federal Credit Union vs Boeing Employees Credit Union

Credit union

Cascade Federal Credit Union

Kent, Washington · $100 million – $1 billion

88of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Boeing Employees Credit Union

Tukwila, Washington · Over $10 billion

75of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureCascade Federal Credit UnionBoeing Employees Credit Union
TellerScore88 (stronger)75
Capital cushion83 (stronger)76
Loan quality7486 (stronger)
Earnings100 (stronger)43
Funding & liquidity100 (stronger)82
Problem-loan coverage9395 (stronger)
Peer percentile92nd75th
Total assets$392.6M$29.6B
Deposits / shares$339.4M$25.9B
Capital ratio13.31% (stronger)12.57%
Problem loans0.79%0.42% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.28% (stronger)0.70%
Return on assets2.44% (stronger)0.58%
Loans ÷ deposits53.5% (stronger)78.7%
Uninsured deposits13.5%8.3% (stronger)
Offices342
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)—554
Complaints per $1B deposits—21.4
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)0.0%26.5%

Cascade Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (88 vs 75). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Cascade Federal Credit Union leads on 5 and Boeing Employees Credit Union on 2. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions