TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Cascade Federal Credit Union vs Castparts Employees Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Cascade Federal Credit Union

Kent, Washington · $100 million – $1 billion

88of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Castparts Employees Federal Credit Union

Portland, Oregon · Under $100 million in assets

85of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureCascade Federal Credit UnionCastparts Employees Federal Credit Union
TellerScore88 (stronger)85
Capital cushion83100 (stronger)
Loan quality74 (stronger)72
Earnings100 (stronger)72
Funding & liquidity100 (stronger)88
Problem-loan coverage9394 (stronger)
Peer percentile92nd77th
Total assets$392.6M$79.9M
Deposits / shares$339.4M$67.6M
Capital ratio13.31%15.71% (stronger)
Problem loans0.79% (stronger)0.84%
Net charge-offs0.28%0.07% (stronger)
Return on assets2.44% (stronger)1.31%
Loans ÷ deposits53.5% (stronger)72.0%
Uninsured deposits13.5%2.5% (stronger)
Offices31
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)0.0%19.0%

Cascade Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (88 vs 85). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Cascade Federal Credit Union leads on 4 and Castparts Employees Federal Credit Union on 3. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions