TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Cascade Federal Credit Union vs Seattle Metropolitan Credit Union

Credit union

Cascade Federal Credit Union

Kent, Washington · $100 million – $1 billion

88of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Seattle Metropolitan Credit Union

Seattle, Washington · $1 billion – $10 billion

60of 100
Moderate

Metric by metric

MeasureCascade Federal Credit UnionSeattle Metropolitan Credit Union
TellerScore88 (stronger)60
Capital cushion83 (stronger)65
Loan quality7479 (stronger)
Earnings100 (stronger)21
Funding & liquidity100 (stronger)53
Problem-loan coverage93 (stronger)89
Peer percentile92nd25th
Total assets$392.6M$1.2B
Deposits / shares$339.4M$921.1M
Capital ratio13.31% (stronger)11.50%
Problem loans0.79%0.63% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.28% (stronger)1.06%
Return on assets2.44% (stronger)0.04%
Loans ÷ deposits53.5% (stronger)107.3%
Uninsured deposits13.5% (stronger)14.6%
Offices39
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)0.0%47.9%

Cascade Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (88 vs 60). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Cascade Federal Credit Union leads on 6 and Seattle Metropolitan Credit Union on 1. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions