Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Cashmere Valley Bank vs Timberland Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Cashmere Valley Bank | Timberland Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 79 (stronger) | 78 |
| Capital cushion | 75 | 79 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 88 (stronger) | 81 |
| Earnings | 64 | 79 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 80 (stronger) | 62 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 97 (stronger) | 94 |
| Peer percentile | 88th | 86th |
| Total assets | $2.3B | $2.1B |
| Deposits / shares | $2.0B | $1.8B |
| Capital ratio | 12.50% | 12.85% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.35% (stronger) | 0.56% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.40% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.10% | 1.47% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 52.1% (stronger) | 84.9% |
| Uninsured deposits | 32.9% | 26.8% (stronger) |
| Offices | 12 | 24 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 7.9% | 17.0% |
Cashmere Valley Bank has the higher TellerScore (79 vs 78). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Cashmere Valley Bank leads on 3 and Timberland Bank on 4. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.