TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Cattle Bank and Trust vs Local 265 Ibew Federal Credit Union

Bank

Cattle Bank and Trust

Seward, Nebraska · $100 million – $1 billion

87of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Local 265 Ibew Federal Credit Union

Lincoln, Nebraska · Under $100 million in assets

54of 100
Below average

Metric by metric

MeasureCattle Bank and TrustLocal 265 Ibew Federal Credit Union
TellerScore87 (stronger)54
Capital cushion79 (stronger)41
Loan quality97 (stronger)41
Earnings100 (stronger)68
Funding & liquidity6469 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage99 (stronger)70
Peer percentile91st13th
Total assets$421.9M$4.9M
Deposits / shares$347.2M$4.3M
Capital ratio12.87% (stronger)9.07%
Problem loans0.08% (stronger)1.76%
Net charge-offs0.00% (stronger)0.14%
Return on assets2.14% (stronger)1.20%
Loans ÷ deposits91.6%90.8% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits19.2%0.0% (stronger)
Offices31
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)3.8%—

Cattle Bank and Trust has the higher TellerScore (87 vs 54). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Cattle Bank and Trust leads on 5 and Local 265 Ibew Federal Credit Union on 2. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions