Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Centennial Bank vs Portrait Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Centennial Bank | Portrait Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 79 | 79 |
| Capital cushion | 76 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 82 | 100 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 100 (stronger) | 0 |
| Funding & liquidity | 40 | 96 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 94 | 100 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 94th | 63rd |
| Total assets | $24.6B | $44.7M |
| Deposits / shares | $19.6B | $594K |
| Capital ratio | 12.61% | 99.23% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.55% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.07% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 2.13% (stronger) | -8.27% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 85.4% | 0.0% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 46.7% | 18.5% (stronger) |
| Offices | 225 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | 55 | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | 2.8 | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 23.4% | — |
Both have the same TellerScore. On the 6 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Centennial Bank leads on 1 and Portrait Bank on 5. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.