Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Centennial Bank vs Sanibel Captiva Community Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Centennial Bank | Sanibel Captiva Community Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 79 (stronger) | 68 |
| Capital cushion | 76 (stronger) | 49 |
| Loan quality | 82 (stronger) | 78 |
| Earnings | 100 (stronger) | 95 |
| Funding & liquidity | 40 | 45 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 94 (stronger) | 83 |
| Peer percentile | 94th | 37th |
| Total assets | $24.6B | $976.2M |
| Deposits / shares | $19.6B | $805.9M |
| Capital ratio | 12.61% (stronger) | 9.92% |
| Problem loans | 0.55% (stronger) | 0.67% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.07% (stronger) | 0.17% |
| Return on assets | 2.13% (stronger) | 1.88% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 85.4% (stronger) | 102.6% |
| Uninsured deposits | 46.7% | 26.1% (stronger) |
| Offices | 225 | 8 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | 55 | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | 2.8 | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 23.4% | 4.3% |
Centennial Bank has the higher TellerScore (79 vs 68). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Centennial Bank leads on 6 and Sanibel Captiva Community Bank on 1. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.