Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Central Bank and Trust vs Buffalo Federal Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Central Bank and Trust | Buffalo Federal Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 78 (stronger) | 70 |
| Capital cushion | 36 | 54 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 100 (stronger) | 78 |
| Earnings | 100 (stronger) | 72 |
| Funding & liquidity | 80 (stronger) | 70 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 (stronger) | 90 |
| Peer percentile | 72nd | 43rd |
| Total assets | $202.5M | $202.6M |
| Deposits / shares | $182.3M | $175.9M |
| Capital ratio | 8.56% | 10.38% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.00% (stronger) | 0.67% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.02% | -0.00% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 2.19% (stronger) | 1.31% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 60.9% (stronger) | 85.6% |
| Uninsured deposits | 32.4% | 18.9% (stronger) |
| Offices | 5 | 3 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 3.2% | — |
Central Bank and Trust has the higher TellerScore (78 vs 70). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Central Bank and Trust leads on 4 and Buffalo Federal Bank on 3. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.