Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
CerescoBank vs FirstBank of Nebraska
Metric by metric
| Measure | CerescoBank | FirstBank of Nebraska |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 92 (stronger) | 77 |
| Capital cushion | 89 (stronger) | 62 |
| Loan quality | 98 (stronger) | 70 |
| Earnings | 81 | 94 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 97 (stronger) | 88 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 (stronger) | 91 |
| Peer percentile | 92nd | 68th |
| Total assets | $81.3M | $498.1M |
| Deposits / shares | $69.0M | $390.1M |
| Capital ratio | 13.85% (stronger) | 11.19% |
| Problem loans | 0.06% (stronger) | 0.89% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.04% | -0.00% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.52% | 1.85% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 63.3% | 59.9% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 13.7% (stronger) | 25.8% |
| Offices | 1 | 4 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | 0.8% |
CerescoBank has the higher TellerScore (92 vs 77). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), CerescoBank leads on 4 and FirstBank of Nebraska on 3. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.