Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
CerescoBank vs Pinnacle Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | CerescoBank | Pinnacle Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 92 (stronger) | 74 |
| Capital cushion | 89 (stronger) | 49 |
| Loan quality | 98 | 98 |
| Earnings | 81 (stronger) | 79 |
| Funding & liquidity | 97 (stronger) | 60 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 (stronger) | 97 |
| Peer percentile | 92nd | 74th |
| Total assets | $81.3M | $9.2B |
| Deposits / shares | $69.0M | $8.1B |
| Capital ratio | 13.85% (stronger) | 9.92% |
| Problem loans | 0.06% (stronger) | 0.07% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.04% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.52% (stronger) | 1.49% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 63.3% (stronger) | 83.0% |
| Uninsured deposits | 13.7% (stronger) | 30.9% |
| Offices | 1 | 64 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | 4.8% |
CerescoBank has the higher TellerScore (92 vs 74). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), CerescoBank leads on 6 and Pinnacle Bank on 1. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.