Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Chambers Bank vs Arvest Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Chambers Bank | Arvest Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 81 (stronger) | 57 |
| Capital cushion | 76 (stronger) | 41 |
| Loan quality | 92 (stronger) | 71 |
| Earnings | 91 (stronger) | 42 |
| Funding & liquidity | 46 | 64 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 97 (stronger) | 86 |
| Peer percentile | 91st | 17th |
| Total assets | $1.6B | $28.1B |
| Deposits / shares | $1.3B | $24.6B |
| Capital ratio | 12.57% (stronger) | 9.11% |
| Problem loans | 0.23% (stronger) | 0.86% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.02% (stronger) | 0.37% |
| Return on assets | 1.76% (stronger) | 0.55% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 86.7% | 82.3% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 40.2% | 27.8% (stronger) |
| Offices | 24 | 220 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | 458 |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | 18.6 |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 11.0% | 18.5% |
Chambers Bank has the higher TellerScore (81 vs 57). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Chambers Bank leads on 5 and Arvest Bank on 2. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.
Where both have branches
- Fayetteville, AR
- Springdale, AR
- Russellville, AR
- Rogers, AR
- Fort Smith, AR
- Hot Springs, AR
- Conway, AR
- Van Buren, AR
- Waldron, AR
- Elkins, AR
- Hot Springs Village, AR
- Mena, AR