Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Chambers Bank vs First Security Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Chambers Bank | First Security Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 81 | 92 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 76 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 92 | 95 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 91 | 94 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 46 | 62 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 97 | 99 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 91st | 99th |
| Total assets | $1.6B | $8.6B |
| Deposits / shares | $1.3B | $6.8B |
| Capital ratio | 12.57% | 15.60% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.23% | 0.14% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.02% (stronger) | 0.47% |
| Return on assets | 1.76% | 1.85% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 86.7% | 66.1% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 40.2% (stronger) | 44.3% |
| Offices | 24 | 77 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 11.0% | 6.6% |
First Security Bank has the higher TellerScore (92 vs 81). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Chambers Bank leads on 2 and First Security Bank on 5. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.