Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Chambers Bank vs Priority Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Chambers Bank | Priority Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 81 (stronger) | 49 |
| Capital cushion | 76 (stronger) | 55 |
| Loan quality | 92 (stronger) | 0 |
| Earnings | 91 (stronger) | 87 |
| Funding & liquidity | 46 | 66 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 97 (stronger) | 52 |
| Peer percentile | 91st | 6th |
| Total assets | $1.6B | $153.4M |
| Deposits / shares | $1.3B | $129.4M |
| Capital ratio | 12.57% (stronger) | 10.52% |
| Problem loans | 0.23% (stronger) | 3.37% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.02% | -0.01% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.76% (stronger) | 1.67% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 86.7% (stronger) | 89.0% |
| Uninsured deposits | 40.2% | 20.1% (stronger) |
| Offices | 24 | 3 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 11.0% | 0.4% |
Chambers Bank has the higher TellerScore (81 vs 49). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Chambers Bank leads on 5 and Priority Bank on 2. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.