Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Charles Schwab Bank, SSB vs Fort Worth City Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | Charles Schwab Bank, SSB | Fort Worth City Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 81 | 93 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 57 | 81 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 99 | 99 |
| Earnings | 73 | 97 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 96 | 97 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 | 100 |
| Peer percentile | 100th | 97th |
| Total assets | $250.8B | $336.8M |
| Deposits / shares | $225.2B | $296.1M |
| Capital ratio | 10.65% | 13.10% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.04% | 0.03% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% (stronger) | 0.08% |
| Return on assets | 1.33% | 1.91% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 29.9% (stronger) | 63.5% |
| Uninsured deposits | 19.0% | 2.8% (stronger) |
| Offices | 0 | 2 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | 764 | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | 3.4 | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 5.2% | 38.4% |
Fort Worth City Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (93 vs 81). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Charles Schwab Bank, SSB leads on 2 and Fort Worth City Credit Union on 5. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.