Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Chicago'S Bravest Credit Union vs Tech Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | Chicago'S Bravest Credit Union | Tech Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 83 (stronger) | 49 |
| Capital cushion | 100 (stronger) | 43 |
| Loan quality | 69 (stronger) | 52 |
| Earnings | 68 (stronger) | 34 |
| Funding & liquidity | 87 (stronger) | 63 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 95 (stronger) | 71 |
| Peer percentile | 72nd | 5th |
| Total assets | $10.6M | $599.0M |
| Deposits / shares | $8.3M | $542.1M |
| Capital ratio | 21.27% (stronger) | 9.29% |
| Problem loans | 0.93% (stronger) | 1.45% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.16% (stronger) | 0.20% |
| Return on assets | 1.21% (stronger) | 0.35% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 73.7% (stronger) | 97.4% |
| Uninsured deposits | 0.1% (stronger) | 7.3% |
| Offices | 1 | 11 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | 20.4% |
Chicago'S Bravest Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (83 vs 49). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Chicago'S Bravest Credit Union leads on 7 and Tech Credit Union on 0. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.