Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Chippewa Valley Bank vs Johnson Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Chippewa Valley Bank | Johnson Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 74 (stronger) | 73 |
| Capital cushion | 37 | 73 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 93 (stronger) | 92 |
| Earnings | 100 (stronger) | 72 |
| Funding & liquidity | 65 (stronger) | 28 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 97 | 97 |
| Peer percentile | 57th | 70th |
| Total assets | $735.8M | $7.1B |
| Deposits / shares | $559.0M | $5.6B |
| Capital ratio | 8.74% | 12.33% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.22% (stronger) | 0.23% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% | -0.06% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 2.05% (stronger) | 1.30% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 94.7% | 94.2% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 15.4% (stronger) | 49.0% |
| Offices | 13 | 32 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 6.3% | 7.8% |
Chippewa Valley Bank has the higher TellerScore (74 vs 73). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Chippewa Valley Bank leads on 4 and Johnson Bank on 3. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.
Where both have branches
- Hayward, WI