TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Christiansted Federal Credit Union vs Afl Cio Employees Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Christiansted Federal Credit Union

Christiansted, U.S. Virgin Islands · Under $100 million in assets

98of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Afl Cio Employees Federal Credit Union

Washington, District of Columbia · Under $100 million in assets

61of 100
Moderate

Metric by metric

MeasureChristiansted Federal Credit UnionAfl Cio Employees Federal Credit Union
TellerScore98 (stronger)61
Capital cushion100 (stronger)74
Loan quality92 (stronger)71
Earnings98 (stronger)8
Funding & liquidity100 (stronger)71
Problem-loan coverage99 (stronger)89
Peer percentile98th23rd
Total assets$34.0M$48.4M
Deposits / shares$26.9M$42.6M
Capital ratio20.63% (stronger)12.45%
Problem loans0.23% (stronger)0.86%
Net charge-offs0.22% (stronger)0.56%
Return on assets1.96% (stronger)-0.31%
Loans ÷ deposits45.3% (stronger)88.8%
Uninsured deposits1.0% (stronger)6.7%
Offices31
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)—16.7%

Christiansted Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (98 vs 61). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Christiansted Federal Credit Union leads on 7 and Afl Cio Employees Federal Credit Union on 0. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions