TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Christiansted Federal Credit Union vs Sargent Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Christiansted Federal Credit Union

Christiansted, U.S. Virgin Islands · Under $100 million in assets

98of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Sargent Federal Credit Union

Washington, District of Columbia · Under $100 million in assets

68of 100
Moderate

Metric by metric

MeasureChristiansted Federal Credit UnionSargent Federal Credit Union
TellerScore98 (stronger)68
Capital cushion100100
Loan quality92 (stronger)0
Earnings98 (stronger)88
Funding & liquidity100100
Problem-loan coverage99 (stronger)57
Peer percentile98th36th
Total assets$34.0M$258K
Deposits / shares$26.9M$208K
Capital ratio20.63% (stronger)16.32%
Problem loans0.23% (stronger)22.05%
Net charge-offs0.22%-2.38% (stronger)
Return on assets1.96% (stronger)1.69%
Loans ÷ deposits45.3%24.3% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits1.0%0.0% (stronger)
Offices32
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Christiansted Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (98 vs 68). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Christiansted Federal Credit Union leads on 4 and Sargent Federal Credit Union on 3. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions