TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Clairton Works Federal Credit Union vs Greater Pittsburgh Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Clairton Works Federal Credit Union

Clairton, Pennsylvania · Under $100 million in assets

87of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Greater Pittsburgh Federal Credit Union

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania · Under $100 million in assets

93of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureClairton Works Federal Credit UnionGreater Pittsburgh Federal Credit Union
TellerScore8793 (stronger)
Capital cushion100100
Loan quality98 (stronger)87
Earnings3583 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity100100
Problem-loan coverage100 (stronger)98
Peer percentile83rd94th
Total assets$11.8M$76.7M
Deposits / shares$10.0M$64.6M
Capital ratio15.24%15.35% (stronger)
Problem loans0.06% (stronger)0.40%
Net charge-offs0.17% (stronger)0.19%
Return on assets0.37%1.57% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits37.4% (stronger)38.3%
Uninsured deposits1.6%0.8% (stronger)
Offices26
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Greater Pittsburgh Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (93 vs 87). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Clairton Works Federal Credit Union leads on 3 and Greater Pittsburgh Federal Credit Union on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions