Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Clinton Savings Bank vs Allcom Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | Clinton Savings Bank | Allcom Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 58 | 85 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 47 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 83 | 98 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 34 | 34 |
| Funding & liquidity | 61 | 91 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 72 | 99 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 16th | 77th |
| Total assets | $744.7M | $81.8M |
| Deposits / shares | $581.6M | $67.8M |
| Capital ratio | 9.65% | 16.60% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.50% | 0.07% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.66% | 0.09% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 0.35% | 0.36% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 88.1% | 69.3% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 25.0% | 3.5% (stronger) |
| Offices | 8 | 2 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 11.4% | — |
Allcom Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (85 vs 58). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Clinton Savings Bank leads on 0 and Allcom Credit Union on 7. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.