TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Clinton Savings Bank vs Leominster Employees Federal Credit Union

Bank

Clinton Savings Bank

Clinton, Massachusetts · $100 million – $1 billion

58of 100
Moderate

Credit union

Leominster Employees Federal Credit Union

Leominster, Massachusetts · Under $100 million in assets

80of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureClinton Savings BankLeominster Employees Federal Credit Union
TellerScore5880 (stronger)
Capital cushion4762 (stronger)
Loan quality83100 (stronger)
Earnings3456 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity61100 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage72100 (stronger)
Peer percentile16th65th
Total assets$744.7M$30.0M
Deposits / shares$581.6M$26.4M
Capital ratio9.65%11.20% (stronger)
Problem loans0.50%0.01% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.66%-0.01% (stronger)
Return on assets0.35%0.90% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits88.1%53.5% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits25.0%0.3% (stronger)
Offices81
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)11.4%—

Leominster Employees Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (80 vs 58). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Clinton Savings Bank leads on 0 and Leominster Employees Federal Credit Union on 7. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions