Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Coleman County State Bank vs One World Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Coleman County State Bank | One World Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 78 (stronger) | 67 |
| Capital cushion | 36 | 82 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 98 | 100 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 100 (stronger) | 0 |
| Funding & liquidity | 85 (stronger) | 51 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 99 | 100 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 72nd | 34th |
| Total assets | $295.1M | $290.1M |
| Deposits / shares | $267.1M | $245.0M |
| Capital ratio | 8.56% | 13.24% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.05% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.02% (stronger) | 4.75% |
| Return on assets | 2.05% (stronger) | -1.30% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 65.5% (stronger) | 90.1% |
| Uninsured deposits | 23.7% (stronger) | 32.5% |
| Offices | 5 | 3 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 2.5% | — |
Coleman County State Bank has the higher TellerScore (78 vs 67). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Coleman County State Bank leads on 5 and One World Bank on 2. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.