TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Colonial Savings, F.A. vs Fort Worth City Credit Union

Bank

Colonial Savings, F.A.

Fort Worth, Texas · $100 million – $1 billion

76of 100
Strong

Credit union

Fort Worth City Credit Union

Fort Worth, Texas · $100 million – $1 billion

93of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureColonial Savings, F.A.Fort Worth City Credit Union
TellerScore7693 (stronger)
Capital cushion100 (stronger)81
Loan quality8799 (stronger)
Earnings097 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity9397 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage100100
Peer percentile64th97th
Total assets$501.8M$336.8M
Deposits / shares$255.3M$296.1M
Capital ratio46.07% (stronger)13.10%
Problem loans0.38%0.03% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.00% (stronger)0.08%
Return on assets-2.41%1.91% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits44.1% (stronger)63.5%
Uninsured deposits21.9%2.8% (stronger)
Offices62
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)—38.4%

Fort Worth City Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (93 vs 76). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Colonial Savings, F.A. leads on 3 and Fort Worth City Credit Union on 4. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions