Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Colonial Savings, F.A. vs Light Commerce Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | Colonial Savings, F.A. | Light Commerce Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 76 | 92 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 100 | 100 |
| Loan quality | 87 (stronger) | 69 |
| Earnings | 0 | 100 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 93 | 98 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 (stronger) | 97 |
| Peer percentile | 64th | 92nd |
| Total assets | $501.8M | $5.0M |
| Deposits / shares | $255.3M | $3.6M |
| Capital ratio | 46.07% (stronger) | 26.81% |
| Problem loans | 0.38% (stronger) | 0.93% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% (stronger) | 0.57% |
| Return on assets | -2.41% | 2.37% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 44.1% (stronger) | 62.1% |
| Uninsured deposits | 21.9% | 0.4% (stronger) |
| Offices | 6 | 3 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Light Commerce Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (92 vs 76). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Colonial Savings, F.A. leads on 4 and Light Commerce Credit Union on 3. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.