TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Concora Wabash Federal Credit Union vs Indiana Heartland Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Concora Wabash Federal Credit Union

Wabash, Indiana · Under $100 million in assets

82of 100
Strong

Credit union

Indiana Heartland Federal Credit Union

Kokomo, Indiana · Under $100 million in assets

55of 100
Moderate

Metric by metric

MeasureConcora Wabash Federal Credit UnionIndiana Heartland Federal Credit Union
TellerScore82 (stronger)55
Capital cushion100 (stronger)66
Loan quality100 (stronger)2
Earnings3686 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity6378 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage100 (stronger)62
Peer percentile70th15th
Total assets$1.2M$49.7M
Deposits / shares$904K$43.5M
Capital ratio21.87% (stronger)11.57%
Problem loans0.00% (stronger)2.94%
Net charge-offs0.29%0.28% (stronger)
Return on assets0.41%1.66% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits96.9%82.2% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits0.0% (stronger)0.6%
Offices12
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Concora Wabash Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (82 vs 55). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Concora Wabash Federal Credit Union leads on 4 and Indiana Heartland Federal Credit Union on 3. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions