TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Consolidated Federal Credit Union vs Ironworkers USA Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Consolidated Federal Credit Union

Portland, Oregon · $100 million – $1 billion

88of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Ironworkers USA Federal Credit Union

Portland, Oregon · $100 million – $1 billion

46of 100
Below average

Metric by metric

MeasureConsolidated Federal Credit UnionIronworkers USA Federal Credit Union
TellerScore88 (stronger)46
Capital cushion100 (stronger)61
Loan quality91 (stronger)1
Earnings65 (stronger)61
Funding & liquidity85 (stronger)64
Problem-loan coverage98 (stronger)57
Peer percentile92nd3rd
Total assets$833.7M$155.9M
Deposits / shares$698.1M$137.8M
Capital ratio15.31% (stronger)11.10%
Problem loans0.27% (stronger)2.97%
Net charge-offs0.06% (stronger)1.16%
Return on assets1.13% (stronger)1.02%
Loans ÷ deposits75.3% (stronger)91.5%
Uninsured deposits8.7% (stronger)19.1%
Offices24
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)25.2%—

Consolidated Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (88 vs 46). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Consolidated Federal Credit Union leads on 7 and Ironworkers USA Federal Credit Union on 0. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions