TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Coosa Pines Federal Credit Union vs Genuine Parts Credit Union

Credit union

Coosa Pines Federal Credit Union

Childersburg, Alabama · $100 million – $1 billion

88of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Genuine Parts Credit Union

Norcross, Georgia · Under $100 million in assets

87of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureCoosa Pines Federal Credit UnionGenuine Parts Credit Union
TellerScore88 (stronger)87
Capital cushion100100
Loan quality71100 (stronger)
Earnings91 (stronger)36
Funding & liquidity88100 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage93100 (stronger)
Peer percentile92nd83rd
Total assets$420.8M$19.5M
Deposits / shares$356.6M$6.2M
Capital ratio16.20%79.20% (stronger)
Problem loans0.87%0.00% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.70% (stronger)3.33%
Return on assets1.77% (stronger)0.41%
Loans ÷ deposits72.3%36.9% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits7.3%0.0% (stronger)
Offices43
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)5.1%—

Coosa Pines Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (88 vs 87). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Coosa Pines Federal Credit Union leads on 3 and Genuine Parts Credit Union on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions