TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Coosa Pines Federal Credit Union vs Mutual Savings Credit Union

Credit union

Coosa Pines Federal Credit Union

Childersburg, Alabama · $100 million – $1 billion

88of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Mutual Savings Credit Union

Birmingham, Alabama · $100 million – $1 billion

65of 100
Moderate

Metric by metric

MeasureCoosa Pines Federal Credit UnionMutual Savings Credit Union
TellerScore88 (stronger)65
Capital cushion100 (stronger)41
Loan quality7194 (stronger)
Earnings91 (stronger)30
Funding & liquidity8892 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage9394 (stronger)
Peer percentile92nd34th
Total assets$420.8M$242.8M
Deposits / shares$356.6M$214.0M
Capital ratio16.20% (stronger)9.06%
Problem loans0.87%0.19% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.70%0.27% (stronger)
Return on assets1.77% (stronger)0.26%
Loans ÷ deposits72.3%68.2% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits7.3% (stronger)12.3%
Offices47
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)5.1%47.7%

Coosa Pines Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (88 vs 65). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Coosa Pines Federal Credit Union leads on 4 and Mutual Savings Credit Union on 3. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions