TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Correctional Workers Federal Credit Union vs Tinker Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Correctional Workers Federal Credit Union

El Reno, Oklahoma · Under $100 million in assets

88of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Tinker Federal Credit Union

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma · $1 billion – $10 billion

83of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureCorrectional Workers Federal Credit UnionTinker Federal Credit Union
TellerScore88 (stronger)83
Capital cushion100 (stronger)97
Loan quality94 (stronger)79
Earnings4953 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity100 (stronger)91
Problem-loan coverage99 (stronger)94
Peer percentile85th92nd
Total assets$10.5M$6.1B
Deposits / shares$8.6M$5.2B
Capital ratio17.88% (stronger)14.72%
Problem loans0.19% (stronger)0.63%
Net charge-offs-0.08% (stronger)0.96%
Return on assets0.72%0.82% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits47.8% (stronger)69.1%
Uninsured deposits0.1% (stronger)13.5%
Offices122
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)—33.6%

Correctional Workers Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (88 vs 83). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Correctional Workers Federal Credit Union leads on 6 and Tinker Federal Credit Union on 1. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions