Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Crews Bank & Trust vs Edison National Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Crews Bank & Trust | Edison National Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 85 (stronger) | 67 |
| Capital cushion | 57 (stronger) | 40 |
| Loan quality | 98 | 100 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 96 (stronger) | 45 |
| Funding & liquidity | 93 (stronger) | 72 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 99 | 100 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 97th | 34th |
| Total assets | $2.3B | $453.7M |
| Deposits / shares | $2.1B | $399.0M |
| Capital ratio | 10.69% (stronger) | 9.03% |
| Problem loans | 0.06% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.02% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.90% (stronger) | 0.61% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 63.1% | 37.0% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 18.7% (stronger) | 40.5% |
| Offices | 18 | 4 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 8.6% | 0.0% |
Crews Bank & Trust has the higher TellerScore (85 vs 67). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Crews Bank & Trust leads on 4 and Edison National Bank on 3. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.