TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Department of the Interior Federal Credit Union vs Christiansted Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Department of the Interior Federal Credit Union

Washington, District of Columbia · $100 million – $1 billion

51of 100
Below average

Credit union

Christiansted Federal Credit Union

Christiansted, U.S. Virgin Islands · Under $100 million in assets

98of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureDepartment of the Interior Federal Credit UnionChristiansted Federal Credit Union
TellerScore5198 (stronger)
Capital cushion25100 (stronger)
Loan quality6492 (stronger)
Earnings4798 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity72100 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage7699 (stronger)
Peer percentile7th98th
Total assets$268.0M$34.0M
Deposits / shares$241.7M$26.9M
Capital ratio7.49%20.63% (stronger)
Problem loans1.09%0.23% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.97%0.22% (stronger)
Return on assets0.67%1.96% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits87.8%45.3% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits9.3%1.0% (stronger)
Offices23
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)57.1%—

Christiansted Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (98 vs 51). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Department of the Interior Federal Credit Union leads on 0 and Christiansted Federal Credit Union on 7. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions