Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Department of the Interior Federal Credit Union vs Idb Global Federal Credit Union
Credit union
Department of the Interior Federal Credit Union
Washington, District of Columbia · $100 million – $1 billion
Credit union
Idb Global Federal Credit Union
Washington, District of Columbia · $100 million – $1 billion
Metric by metric
| Measure | Department of the Interior Federal Credit Union | Idb Global Federal Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 51 | 74 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 25 | 73 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 64 | 96 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 47 (stronger) | 38 |
| Funding & liquidity | 72 (stronger) | 71 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 76 | 99 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 7th | 63rd |
| Total assets | $268.0M | $842.4M |
| Deposits / shares | $241.7M | $713.6M |
| Capital ratio | 7.49% | 12.34% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 1.09% | 0.13% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.97% | 0.04% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 0.67% (stronger) | 0.45% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 87.8% | 78.4% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 9.3% (stronger) | 24.5% |
| Offices | 2 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 57.1% | 0.9% |
Idb Global Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (74 vs 51). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Department of the Interior Federal Credit Union leads on 2 and Idb Global Federal Credit Union on 5. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.