Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Department of the Interior Federal Credit Union vs Lee Federal Credit Union
Credit union
Department of the Interior Federal Credit Union
Washington, District of Columbia · $100 million – $1 billion
Credit union
Lee Federal Credit Union
Washington, District of Columbia · Under $100 million in assets
Metric by metric
| Measure | Department of the Interior Federal Credit Union | Lee Federal Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 51 | 99 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 25 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 64 | 100 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 47 | 95 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 72 | 100 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 76 | 100 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 7th | 99th |
| Total assets | $268.0M | $5.5M |
| Deposits / shares | $241.7M | $2.7M |
| Capital ratio | 7.49% | 50.68% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 1.09% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.97% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 0.67% | 1.86% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 87.8% | 44.8% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 9.3% | 0.0% (stronger) |
| Offices | 2 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 57.1% | — |
Lee Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (99 vs 51). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Department of the Interior Federal Credit Union leads on 0 and Lee Federal Credit Union on 7. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.