TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Department of the Interior Federal Credit Union vs O.A.S. Staff Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Department of the Interior Federal Credit Union

Washington, District of Columbia · $100 million – $1 billion

51of 100
Below average

Credit union

O.A.S. Staff Federal Credit Union

Washington, District of Columbia · $100 million – $1 billion

37of 100
Low

Metric by metric

MeasureDepartment of the Interior Federal Credit UnionO.A.S. Staff Federal Credit Union
TellerScore51 (stronger)37
Capital cushion2526 (stronger)
Loan quality64 (stronger)14
Earnings47 (stronger)25
Funding & liquidity7298 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage76 (stronger)60
Peer percentile7th1st
Total assets$268.0M$282.4M
Deposits / shares$241.7M$264.9M
Capital ratio7.49%7.63% (stronger)
Problem loans1.09% (stronger)2.58%
Net charge-offs0.97%0.07% (stronger)
Return on assets0.67% (stronger)0.12%
Loans ÷ deposits87.8%62.3% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits9.3%8.0% (stronger)
Offices20
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)57.1%—

Department of the Interior Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (51 vs 37). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Department of the Interior Federal Credit Union leads on 3 and O.A.S. Staff Federal Credit Union on 4. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions