TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Drake Bank vs Toro Employees Federal Credit Union

Bank

Drake Bank

Saint Paul, Minnesota · $100 million – $1 billion

18of 100
Low

Credit union

Toro Employees Federal Credit Union

Bloomington, Minnesota · Under $100 million in assets

84of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureDrake BankToro Employees Federal Credit Union
TellerScore1884 (stronger)
Capital cushion2395 (stronger)
Loan quality081 (stronger)
Earnings073 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity7172 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage094 (stronger)
Peer percentile0th75th
Total assets$247.4M$41.5M
Deposits / shares$211.6M$34.9M
Capital ratio7.27%14.46% (stronger)
Problem loans4.49%0.56% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.65%0.30% (stronger)
Return on assets-1.24%1.34% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits88.8%88.0% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits14.2%4.1% (stronger)
Offices11
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)8.0%—

Toro Employees Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (84 vs 18). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Drake Bank leads on 0 and Toro Employees Federal Credit Union on 7. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions