Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
EagleBank vs Lee Federal Credit Union
Credit union
Lee Federal Credit Union
Washington, District of Columbia · Under $100 million in assets
Metric by metric
| Measure | EagleBank | Lee Federal Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 54 | 99 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 65 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 32 | 100 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 41 | 95 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 66 | 100 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 79 | 100 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 12th | 99th |
| Total assets | $9.6B | $5.5M |
| Deposits / shares | $8.2B | $2.7M |
| Capital ratio | 11.49% | 50.68% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 2.05% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 2.11% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 0.52% | 1.86% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 79.9% | 44.8% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 27.7% | 0.0% (stronger) |
| Offices | 13 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | 15 | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | 1.8 | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 0.0% | — |
Lee Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (99 vs 54). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), EagleBank leads on 0 and Lee Federal Credit Union on 7. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.