Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
EvaBank vs Redstone Federal Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | EvaBank | Redstone Federal Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 78 | 85 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 100 (stronger) | 89 |
| Loan quality | 46 | 77 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 100 (stronger) | 75 |
| Funding & liquidity | 50 | 100 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 88 | 95 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 72nd | 94th |
| Total assets | $490.6M | $8.6B |
| Deposits / shares | $340.6M | $7.5B |
| Capital ratio | 27.85% (stronger) | 13.86% |
| Problem loans | 1.61% | 0.70% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.40% (stronger) | 0.96% |
| Return on assets | 2.53% (stronger) | 1.38% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 114.1% | 49.3% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 14.2% | 7.2% (stronger) |
| Offices | 6 | 20 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | 23.2% |
Redstone Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (85 vs 78). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), EvaBank leads on 3 and Redstone Federal Credit Union on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.