TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

F a a Federal Credit Union vs Asbestos Workers Local 14 Federal Credit Union

Credit union

F a a Federal Credit Union

Cordova, Tennessee · $100 million – $1 billion

91of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Asbestos Workers Local 14 Federal Credit Union

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania · Under $100 million in assets

100of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureF a a Federal Credit UnionAsbestos Workers Local 14 Federal Credit Union
TellerScore91100 (stronger)
Capital cushion100100
Loan quality71100 (stronger)
Earnings91100 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity100100
Problem-loan coverage97100 (stronger)
Peer percentile96th100th
Total assets$131.1M$4.1M
Deposits / shares$107.2M$3.5M
Capital ratio18.64% (stronger)15.40%
Problem loans0.87%0.00% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.08%0.00% (stronger)
Return on assets1.77%2.26% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits41.1%21.0% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits4.1%0.0% (stronger)
Offices62
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Asbestos Workers Local 14 Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (100 vs 91). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), F a a Federal Credit Union leads on 1 and Asbestos Workers Local 14 Federal Credit Union on 6. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions