Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Falcon International Bank vs PrimeBank of Texas
Metric by metric
| Measure | Falcon International Bank | PrimeBank of Texas |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 85 (stronger) | 79 |
| Capital cushion | 84 (stronger) | 67 |
| Loan quality | 100 | 100 |
| Earnings | 81 | 89 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 60 (stronger) | 39 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 | 100 |
| Peer percentile | 97th | 75th |
| Total assets | $2.2B | $279.7M |
| Deposits / shares | $2.0B | $244.2M |
| Capital ratio | 13.44% (stronger) | 11.66% |
| Problem loans | 0.00% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.02% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.53% | 1.72% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 73.7% (stronger) | 75.4% |
| Uninsured deposits | 39.4% (stronger) | 56.4% |
| Offices | 18 | 3 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 23.7% | — |
Falcon International Bank has the higher TellerScore (85 vs 79). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Falcon International Bank leads on 4 and PrimeBank of Texas on 3. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.