Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Falcon International Bank vs Texas Health Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | Falcon International Bank | Texas Health Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 85 (stronger) | 66 |
| Capital cushion | 84 | 88 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 100 (stronger) | 28 |
| Earnings | 81 (stronger) | 46 |
| Funding & liquidity | 60 | 97 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 (stronger) | 84 |
| Peer percentile | 97th | 37th |
| Total assets | $2.2B | $134.3M |
| Deposits / shares | $2.0B | $126.0M |
| Capital ratio | 13.44% | 13.77% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.00% (stronger) | 2.17% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.02% (stronger) | 1.54% |
| Return on assets | 1.53% (stronger) | 0.65% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 73.7% | 55.3% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 39.4% | 17.8% (stronger) |
| Offices | 18 | 2 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 23.7% | 15.6% |
Falcon International Bank has the higher TellerScore (85 vs 66). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Falcon International Bank leads on 4 and Texas Health Credit Union on 3. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.