Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Farmers National Bank vs International Bank of Chicago
Metric by metric
| Measure | Farmers National Bank | International Bank of Chicago |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 88 (stronger) | 82 |
| Capital cushion | 100 (stronger) | 75 |
| Loan quality | 92 | 98 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 67 | 93 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 76 (stronger) | 46 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 98 (stronger) | 91 |
| Peer percentile | 92nd | 82nd |
| Total assets | $895.7M | $982.7M |
| Deposits / shares | $637.2M | $863.0M |
| Capital ratio | 15.03% (stronger) | 12.54% |
| Problem loans | 0.23% | 0.05% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% | -0.00% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.17% | 1.82% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 76.9% (stronger) | 85.2% |
| Uninsured deposits | 22.0% (stronger) | 41.4% |
| Offices | 4 | 6 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 1.0% | 8.1% |
Farmers National Bank has the higher TellerScore (88 vs 82). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Farmers National Bank leads on 4 and International Bank of Chicago on 3. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.