TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Fidelity Co-operative Bank vs Reading Co-operative Bank

Bank

Fidelity Co-operative Bank

Leominster, Massachusetts · $1 billion – $10 billion

39of 100
Low

Bank

Reading Co-operative Bank

Reading, Massachusetts · $1 billion – $10 billion

56of 100
Moderate

Metric by metric

MeasureFidelity Co-operative BankReading Co-operative Bank
TellerScore3956 (stronger)
Capital cushion49 (stronger)23
Loan quality098 (stronger)
Earnings52 (stronger)37
Funding & liquidity59 (stronger)47
Problem-loan coverage5299 (stronger)
Peer percentile2nd15th
Total assets$1.3B$1.2B
Deposits / shares$1.1B$1.0B
Capital ratio9.86% (stronger)7.35%
Problem loans4.44%0.06% (stronger)
Net charge-offs1.80%0.08% (stronger)
Return on assets0.80% (stronger)0.42%
Loans ÷ deposits84.7% (stronger)94.9%
Uninsured deposits29.8% (stronger)31.0%
Offices1313
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)18.9%13.2%

Reading Co-operative Bank has the higher TellerScore (56 vs 39). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Fidelity Co-operative Bank leads on 4 and Reading Co-operative Bank on 3. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions