Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Fieldpoint Private Bank & Trust vs Latvian Federal Credit Union
Credit union
Latvian Federal Credit Union
Melville, New York · Under $100 million in assets
Metric by metric
| Measure | Fieldpoint Private Bank & Trust | Latvian Federal Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 34 | 88 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 16 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 36 | 100 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 9 | 42 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 82 | 100 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 62 | 100 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 1st | 85th |
| Total assets | $867.1M | $1.8M |
| Deposits / shares | $781.8M | $1.4M |
| Capital ratio | 6.62% | 25.25% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 1.93% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.02% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | -0.29% | 0.55% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 78.4% | 20.4% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 13.5% | 0.0% (stronger) |
| Offices | 2 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Latvian Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (88 vs 34). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Fieldpoint Private Bank & Trust leads on 0 and Latvian Federal Credit Union on 7. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.