Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
First Federal Savings Bank of Angola vs Three Rivers Federal Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | First Federal Savings Bank of Angola | Three Rivers Federal Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 86 (stronger) | 78 |
| Capital cushion | 100 (stronger) | 89 |
| Loan quality | 100 (stronger) | 51 |
| Earnings | 61 | 97 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 57 | 72 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 (stronger) | 86 |
| Peer percentile | 90th | 84th |
| Total assets | $137.3M | $2.9B |
| Deposits / shares | $103.5M | $2.1B |
| Capital ratio | 23.28% (stronger) | 13.88% |
| Problem loans | 0.00% (stronger) | 1.47% |
| Net charge-offs | -0.00% (stronger) | 0.43% |
| Return on assets | 1.03% | 1.92% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 103.5% | 86.4% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 7.8% (stronger) | 16.3% |
| Offices | 1 | 11 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | 16.3% |
First Federal Savings Bank of Angola has the higher TellerScore (86 vs 78). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), First Federal Savings Bank of Angola leads on 5 and Three Rivers Federal Credit Union on 2. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.