Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
First National Bank Alaska vs Mt. McKinley Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | First National Bank Alaska | Mt. McKinley Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 77 | 79 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 69 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 84 (stronger) | 61 |
| Earnings | 86 (stronger) | 48 |
| Funding & liquidity | 58 | 96 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 95 (stronger) | 93 |
| Peer percentile | 83rd | 75th |
| Total assets | $5.1B | $635.2M |
| Deposits / shares | $3.7B | $523.7M |
| Capital ratio | 11.95% | 18.85% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.47% (stronger) | 1.18% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.02% (stronger) | 0.03% |
| Return on assets | 1.65% (stronger) | 0.69% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 76.2% | 54.8% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 39.0% | 19.0% (stronger) |
| Offices | 27 | 5 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 14.8% | — |
Mt. McKinley Bank has the higher TellerScore (79 vs 77). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), First National Bank Alaska leads on 3 and Mt. McKinley Bank on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.