Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
First National Bank of Clarksdale vs Woodforest National Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | First National Bank of Clarksdale | Woodforest National Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 73 (stronger) | 60 |
| Capital cushion | 78 (stronger) | 43 |
| Loan quality | 79 (stronger) | 36 |
| Earnings | 50 | 100 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 67 | 74 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 93 (stronger) | 73 |
| Peer percentile | 53rd | 21st |
| Total assets | $386.1M | $9.0B |
| Deposits / shares | $342.0M | $8.1B |
| Capital ratio | 12.83% (stronger) | 9.35% |
| Problem loans | 0.64% (stronger) | 1.93% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.01% (stronger) | 0.26% |
| Return on assets | 0.75% | 2.05% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 72.1% | 71.2% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 34.1% | 28.3% (stronger) |
| Offices | 5 | 739 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
First National Bank of Clarksdale has the higher TellerScore (73 vs 60). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), First National Bank of Clarksdale leads on 4 and Woodforest National Bank on 3. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.