Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
First National Bank of Omaha vs Bank of Estes Park
Metric by metric
| Measure | First National Bank of Omaha | Bank of Estes Park |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 72 | 76 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 58 | 58 |
| Loan quality | 74 | 100 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 92 (stronger) | 50 |
| Funding & liquidity | 55 | 90 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 92 | 100 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 79th | 64th |
| Total assets | $34.2B | $171.9M |
| Deposits / shares | $27.8B | $155.4M |
| Capital ratio | 10.83% | 10.84% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.78% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 1.84% | 1.21% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.79% (stronger) | 0.75% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 84.5% | 61.2% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 33.9% | 23.7% (stronger) |
| Offices | 125 | 3 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | 1,803 | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | 64.9 | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 25.9% | — |
Bank of Estes Park has the higher TellerScore (76 vs 72). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), First National Bank of Omaha leads on 1 and Bank of Estes Park on 6. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.