Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
First National Bank of Omaha vs Tri-Valley Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | First National Bank of Omaha | Tri-Valley Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 72 (stronger) | 36 |
| Capital cushion | 58 (stronger) | 43 |
| Loan quality | 74 (stronger) | 0 |
| Earnings | 92 (stronger) | 27 |
| Funding & liquidity | 55 | 95 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 92 (stronger) | 35 |
| Peer percentile | 79th | 2nd |
| Total assets | $34.2B | $82.8M |
| Deposits / shares | $27.8B | $77.4M |
| Capital ratio | 10.83% (stronger) | 9.25% |
| Problem loans | 0.78% (stronger) | 4.09% |
| Net charge-offs | 1.84% | 0.81% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.79% (stronger) | 0.18% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 84.5% | 62.6% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 33.9% | 17.8% (stronger) |
| Offices | 125 | 4 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | 1,803 | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | 64.9 | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 25.9% | — |
First National Bank of Omaha has the higher TellerScore (72 vs 36). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), First National Bank of Omaha leads on 4 and Tri-Valley Bank on 3. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.
Where both have branches
- Glenwood, IA